Updates to irl blog post
This commit is contained in:
parent
f97fef3296
commit
989a062e6e
1 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ into a future release.
|
|||
|
||||
## WiFi HaLow
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional WiFi operates at 2.4GHz, 5GHz, and up to provide high speed connections between local devices.
|
||||
Traditional WiFi operates at 2.4GHz and 5GHz, and aims to provide high speed connections between local devices.
|
||||
The higher the speed, the higher the frequency of the carrier required, and pushes in this direction have led to the
|
||||
development of the WiGig standard offering multi-gigabit speeds operating at 60GHz.
|
||||
There is a tradeoff however that as the frequency increases the distance that the signal propagates and the materials
|
||||
it can propagate through both decrease.
|
||||
There is a tradeoff however: as the frequency increases the distance that the signal propagates and its ability to
|
||||
propagate through materials both decrease.
|
||||
|
||||
WiFi HaLow is IEEE 802.11ah, a wireless protocol that takes WiFi and moves it down below 1 GHz. This is 863-870MHz in
|
||||
ITU region 1 and some countries in region 3, and 902-928MHz in region 2.
|
||||
|
|
@ -43,19 +43,19 @@ Being in this lower frequency range means that signal can propagate further and
|
|||
materials like those found in urban environments.
|
||||
|
||||
To be compliant with the local rules governing radio spectrum use, the transmissions must be entirely contained within
|
||||
the available frequency range and for data transmissions there can be some "spillover" affecting nearby frequencies from
|
||||
the available frequency range, as for data transmissions there can be some "spillover" affecting nearby frequencies from
|
||||
the signal.
|
||||
In region 2, including the United States, there is a full 26MHz available allowing for 8MHz wide channels and a
|
||||
theoretical maximum throughput of 43Mbps.
|
||||
In regions 1 and 3 however there is only 7MHz available allowing for a 2MHz wide channel with maximum theoretical
|
||||
throughput of 8.9Mbps.
|
||||
|
||||
The trade-offs is straightforward: you sacrifice throughput for range.
|
||||
The trade-off is straightforward: you sacrifice throughput for range.
|
||||
HaLow promises roughly 10× the range and 100× the coverage area of conventional WiFi, which matters when you're rapidly
|
||||
deploying an ad-hoc network responding to an evolving situation.
|
||||
It is not a replacement for the WiFi that carries your video calls.
|
||||
It is a means of tactical communication and dissemination of updates received from outside the network, allowing for
|
||||
the exchange of critical messaging and maintaining situational awareness for responders during communications outages.
|
||||
It is not a replacement for the WiFi that carries video calls, but rather a means of tactical communication and
|
||||
dissemination of updates received from outside the network, allowing for the exchange of critical messaging and
|
||||
maintaining situational awareness for responders during communications outages.
|
||||
|
||||
In our evaluation of WiFi HaLow, we used the Morse Micro
|
||||
[MM8108-EKH19 Evaluation Kit](https://www.morsemicro.com/resources/product_brief/MM8108-EKH19-Product-Brief.pdf) which
|
||||
|
|
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ devices competing for spectrum. (Check out the
|
|||
[Morse Micro YouTube channel](https://www.youtube.com/@morsemicro) if you want to see some ideal environment tests, like
|
||||
this one [achieving 3km range along Ocean Beach, California](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xlUijXucoM)).
|
||||
|
||||
At 500 meters it was still possible, albeit frustrating slow at times, to access the Butter Box interface over the
|
||||
At 500 meters it was still possible, albeit frustratingly slow at times, to access the Butter Box interface over the
|
||||
bridge. At that distance, it would be practical to have a second Butter Box to provide an interface and Delta Chat
|
||||
relay, and then allow the relays to communicate over the bridge but keep other interactions local. Delta Chat is built
|
||||
on email which was designed to be delay tolerant from the start and so is well suited for this use case.
|
||||
|
|
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ They were labelled as "USR-LG206-P" and while we were unable to obtain a datashe
|
|||
|
||||
We confirmed that data could indeed be sent over greater distances than WiFi HaLow in our initial testing however this
|
||||
throughput was not suitable to attempt to load the Butter Box portal.
|
||||
One possibility that we would have explored given more time would be to run UUCP over the emulated serial link.
|
||||
One possibility for future exploration would be to run UUCP over the emulated serial link.
|
||||
The necessary software for this [is maintained in Debian to this day](https://packages.debian.org/sid/uucp) and would
|
||||
be ready for configuration in a custom Delta Chat relay configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue