feat: more content
This commit is contained in:
parent
121df8c80d
commit
9c6a30456b
11 changed files with 165 additions and 84 deletions
33
docs/censorship/collateral.mdx
Normal file
33
docs/censorship/collateral.mdx
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Collateral Freedom
|
||||
sidebar_position: 30
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Collateral freedom is an anti-censorship strategy that attempts to make it **economically prohibitive** for censors to
|
||||
block a resource.
|
||||
The diverse needs of businesses to exchange information across international borders makes it impossible to build a
|
||||
catalogue of "good" and "bad" networks or websites.
|
||||
A censor requires some confidence when they block a resource that it won't be affecting economic activity.
|
||||
It’s difficult to achieve accuracy with filtering as most internet traffic is encrypted and must be categorised
|
||||
at speed to make blocking decisions.
|
||||
As a result, censors will usually err on the side of under-blocking.
|
||||
|
||||
One way to exploit this is by deploying solutions in large platforms that are **“too big to block”**, like public cloud
|
||||
providers.
|
||||
Public cloud providers host large numbers of clients in shared infrastructure to benefit from economies of scale, but
|
||||
this sharing also makes it difficult to know what content is being accessed.
|
||||
Similarly, large social networks host content from large numbers of publishers but all traffic between the user and the
|
||||
social network is typically encrypted and so the censor cannot know what is being read.
|
||||
Blocking the cloud provider would have a negative impact on businesses and would hurt state revenue, and blocking the
|
||||
social media platform would cause backlash from the people: neither is an attractive option for the censor.
|
||||
|
||||
Another approach is to use constantly rotating identifiers, as even where a resource may be easy to block once
|
||||
identified, a new resource can be deployed quickly to replace it rendering the blocks ineffective.
|
||||
Due to erring on the side of under-blocking, attempts to access previously unseen content usually succeed.
|
||||
Even with a procedure for screening or approval, blocking by default would bog down innovation and development to the
|
||||
extent that it could cease, certainly falling behind other economies.
|
||||
This approach is particularly suited for news media where the majority of readers will be interested in an article for
|
||||
only a short time after it is published, and if it is later blocked by the censor then the effect will be minimal.
|
||||
|
||||
With collateral freedom on your side **you can have the upper hand** when it comes to making your content accessible to
|
||||
your audience.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue